Skip to content
  1. Mar 16, 2018
  2. Mar 13, 2018
  3. Mar 11, 2018
    • Luker's avatar
      RFC6330 conformity · 714185d6
      Luker authored
      
      
      We were doing really bad stuff.
      * we were not using the correct block size, but instead
        creating something completely out-of standard
        This surely means that we were not compatible with
        OpenRQ (Ticket #20), and possibly a reason for which
        decoding fails too ofter (Ticket #21).
      * We used the wrong ESI number, which should skip
        the padding numbers (#23, #20)
      * we did not expose the real block size to the user
        of the RFC namespace (RFC iterators)
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLuca Fulchir <luker@fenrirproject.org>
      714185d6
  4. Mar 10, 2018
  5. Mar 06, 2018
  6. Mar 03, 2018
  7. Feb 27, 2018
  8. Feb 05, 2018
  9. Jan 08, 2018
  10. Jan 07, 2018
  11. Jan 04, 2018
  12. Dec 21, 2017
  13. Dec 19, 2017
  14. Dec 12, 2017
  15. Dec 11, 2017
  16. Jan 02, 2017
  17. Dec 30, 2016
  18. Dec 27, 2016
  19. Dec 15, 2016
  20. Nov 25, 2016